We don't have one product.
We build a different one for every school.
Below are four examples of what that looks like. Each one hands a teacher back an evening, or gives a student English that lasts. Yours would be built around your own school.
Start with a conversationWe build a different system for every school, so there is no catalogue. Here are four we could build for yours. The names and numbers are invented. The craft is real.
Nothing reaches a student until you approve it. Every time.
You set the brief: the class, the grammar focus, the CEFR level, and a one-line note to steer it. The software drafts the questions, then stops and waits for you. You read every one and change anything before it goes out. A B2 worksheet that took an evening now takes a minute, and the final say is yours, every time.
- Rewrite using a noun: “They decided to wait.”
- Choose the noun form of “analyse”.
Illustrative example. Sample data.
English at the speed people actually speak.
The student hears a short clip of natural, everyday English, answers what they caught, and replays anything they missed. It runs at the speed people really talk, not the slow, careful voice of a test.
Illustrative example. Sample data.
English the students actually speak.
A short daily reading at the student's level, then a question they answer out loud. The app listens, shows what to fix, and moves them on. Built for the moment a stranger asks a question, not just the test.
Illustrative example. Sample data.
What parents see, in the language they read.
A parent opens their child's page and reads an honest picture: what improved, what hasn't yet, and a note from the teacher. One tap switches the whole thing between Vietnamese and English.
Khanh Vy spoke up more in class this week. Her writing still needs longer sentences.
Illustrative example. Sample data.
Questions schools ask
Your teachers stay in charge. The software drafts feedback in each teacher's own voice and house style, which they set in advance, and nothing reaches a student until the teacher has approved it. It is there to save the hour of writing, not to replace the teacher's judgment.
Yes, and not as a box-ticking exercise. We build tools that raise the English students can actually use, and meeting Decision 2371 follows from doing that well, rather than being bolted on afterwards. We design your reporting around the standard, so you can show progress clearly, to inspectors and to parents.
We build for the range in a real classroom, not for an average student who does not exist. Work can be set at different levels at once, so a student who is behind and a student who is ahead are both met where they are.
They can, if your school wants that. We can build a parent dashboard that shows a child's progress honestly and clearly. It is optional, and you control exactly what parents see and what they do not.
Yes. We build bilingual by default, because your school, your teachers, and your parents all work in both. Each person uses it in the language they are most comfortable in.
Of course. We build in stages. Many schools start with the one thing causing the most pain, see it working, and add more once they trust it. You are never forced to build everything at once.
These are examples. Yours would be built for you.
Tell us a little about your school. We will show you what we would build for your teachers and your students, with a clear plan and a fixed price, before you agree to anything.
No pitch. No pressure. No contract.